Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on

Case Research

to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	10/17/2011
End Date of Disposition	10/16/2013
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Moll, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for two years. While representing a client in federal multidistrict litigation, he violated a court order relating to confidential discovery materials when he permitted an unauthorized person to view documents that were subject to the order and also participated in the filing of a motion to intervene in the case without first obtaining the signature of the purported intervenor. The suspension is effective on October 17, 2011.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	03/04/2008
End Date of Disposition	03/04/2010
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. This mandate subsequently vacated or recalled.
Effective Date of Disposition	01/23/2008
End Date of Disposition	03/04/2008
Definition of Disposition	A suspension until further order of the Court reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer has demonstrated rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Moll, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He failed to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of a couple who lost a two-year old child, then lied to the clients about his handling of their claim. He was previously disciplined on two occasions for unrelated misconduct.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	10/11/2006
End Date of Disposition	12/10/2006
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Moll, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for sixty days. According to the ARDC Review Board, he held himself out as authorized to practice during a prior three-month suspension by continuing to publish a web site under his name and by authorizing employees of his firm to correspond and sign pleadings under his name during the suspension. He also misled a court and the other counsel in a class action case by failing to advise them that he had entered into a consent petition proposing that he be suspended for three months at a time when he asked to be appointed lead counsel for the class. Days after the court approved the agreement appointing him as lead counsel, Mr. Moll was suspended, requiring appointment of a different lead counsel, revision and republication of newspaper notices about the class action, reprinting of notices intended to be mailed to class members and revision of web site information about the claims process. The suspension is effective on October 11, 2006.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	05/17/2000
End Date of Disposition	08/17/2000
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.