Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on

Case Research

to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

Disposition	Disbarment
Effective Date of Disposition	05/20/2013
End Date of Disposition	No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Discipline continues until further order of the Court.
Definition of Disposition	Disbarment is a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct warranting the most serious sanction. The disbarred lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the disbarment and may not return to the practice of law unless and until he or she has demonstrated his or her rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case, which may not be filed until five years after the effective date of the disbarment.
Case Summary	Mr. Kalagis, who was licensed in 1995, was disbarred. He settled two different claims without his clients’ knowledge or authority. In addition, he misappropriated more than $100,000 in connection with three different client matters. He did not appear at his disciplinary hearing.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	06/19/2012
End Date of Disposition	04/19/2013
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Kalagis, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended on May 18, 2011, for one year, with all but the first sixty days stayed by probation, subject to conditions. He failed to properly preserve the identity of $13,185.44 in funds due clients or third persons. Because he failed to comply with several of the conditions of his probation, the probation was revoked, the stay of his suspension was vacated, and he was suspended for the remaining ten months of his suspension.

Disposition	Probation
Effective Date of Disposition	08/07/2011
End Date of Disposition	No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Probation continues until compliance with probationary condition(s).
Definition of Disposition	Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period. Suspension stayed in part.
Effective Date of Disposition	06/08/2011
End Date of Disposition	08/07/2011
Definition of Disposition	The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Kalagis, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended for one year, with all but the first sixty days stayed by probation, subject to conditions. He failed to properly preserve the identity of $13,185.44 in funds due clients or third persons. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2011.