Craig Justin Katz
as of 6/18/2026 6:54:40 AM
Craig Justin Katz
Craig Katz
1106 Terrance Court
Deerfield, Illinois 60015-4832
(847) 212-4583
Not available
Date Admitted
November 05, 1981
Illinois Registration Status
Not authorized to practice law due to discipline – Last Registered Year: 2010
Malpractice Insurance
No malpractice report as attorney is disciplined
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.
Click on to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.
Click on to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 09CH0101
| Disposition | Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 05/18/2011 |
| End Date of Disposition | |
| Definition of Disposition | A suspension until further order of the Court reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer has demonstrated rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Katz, who was licensed in 1981, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He neglected a client’s criminal matter and failed to return unearned fees to the client. He also failed to file a notice of appeal for another client, did not respond to communications and orders of the Illinois Appellate Court, and was eventually held in contempt of court. |
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 05CH0028
| Disposition | Suspension with condition(s) |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 02/11/2010 |
| End Date of Disposition | |
| Definition of Disposition | A suspension with conditions reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants both an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, and the imposition of conditions with which the lawyer must comply. The suspension may be for a fixed period of time or for a fixed period of time and until the lawyer complies with the conditions. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Katz, who was licensed in 1981, was suspended for fifteen months and until he pays certain restitution. During a previous period of suspension from the practice of law for misconduct, he accepted a fee to represent a client. He also neglected a client matter, failed to keep his client informed of the status of the client’s legal case and failed to promptly return unearned fees to his client. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2010. |
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 00CH0063
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Probation |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 01/03/2005 |
| End Date of Disposition | 05/30/2006 Probationary condition(s) satisfied. |
| Definition of Disposition | Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. |
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 00CH0063
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 10/18/2004 |
| End Date of Disposition | 01/03/2005 Condition(s) continue. |
| Definition of Disposition | A suspension until further order of the Court reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer has demonstrated rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Katz, who was licensed in 1981, was suspended until he complies with Supreme Court Rule 764 and until further order of the Court. In 2003, he was suspended for two years, with the second year stayed by probation subject to certain conditions, including payment of $16,080 restitution. Discipline was imposed because he had failed to safeguard client funds in four different matters, did not promptly deliver funds to the clients in three of those matters, and converted client funds. After he was suspended, he failed to file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a required affidavit of compliance and a list of his clients. |
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 00CH0063
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Probation |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 09/19/2004 |
| End Date of Disposition | 10/18/2004 |
| Definition of Disposition | Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. |
In re Katz, Craig Justin, 00CH0063
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Suspension for a specified period. Suspension stayed in part. |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 09/19/2003 |
| End Date of Disposition | 09/19/2004 |
| Definition of Disposition | The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension. |
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. Disciplinary results displayed above, if any, include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.
ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.
ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.