Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on

Case Research

to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

Disposition	Probation
Effective Date of Disposition	01/08/2013
End Date of Disposition	04/17/2014 Probationary condition(s) satisfied.
Definition of Disposition	Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period. Suspension stayed in part.
Effective Date of Disposition	10/08/2012
End Date of Disposition	01/08/2013
Definition of Disposition	The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Brown, who was licensed in 1985, was suspended for nine months, with the suspension stayed after three months by a one-year term of conditional probation. He commingled client funds with his own and provided clients with prohibited financial assistance in several personal injury matters. The suspension is effective on October 8, 2012.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	04/07/2008
End Date of Disposition	10/07/2008
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Brown, who was licensed to practice in 1985, was suspended for six months. He neglected a criminal matter and a property damage claim. He was previously disciplined for similar misconduct. The suspension is effective on April 7, 2008.

Disposition	Suspension with condition(s)
Effective Date of Disposition	05/24/2002
End Date of Disposition	07/31/2002 Condition(s) satisfied.
Definition of Disposition	A suspension with conditions reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants both an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, and the imposition of conditions with which the lawyer must comply. The suspension may be for a fixed period of time or for a fixed period of time and until the lawyer complies with the conditions. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. Brown, who was licensed in 1985, was suspended for sixty days and until he successfully completes the professionalism seminar of the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute. He placed an advertisement in a telephone book stating that he practiced medical malpractice law and had more than ten years of litigation and trial experience when, in fact, he had never handled any medical malpractice matter. A client hired him based on his advertisement. He later neglected the claim, and it is now time-barred.