David Andre Bertha
as of 6/18/2026 3:13:48 AM
David Andre Bertha
9242 South Constance Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60617-3624
(773) 752-0737
Not available
Date Admitted
November 07, 2002
Illinois Registration Status
Not authorized to practice law due to discipline and has not demonstrated required MCLE compliance – Last Registered Year: 2014
Malpractice Insurance
No malpractice report as attorney is disciplined
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.
Click on to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.
Click on to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.
In re Bertha, David Andre, 2014PR00121
| Disposition | Disbarment |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 01/21/2016 |
| End Date of Disposition | No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Discipline continues until further order of the Court. |
| Definition of Disposition | Disbarment is a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct warranting the most serious sanction. The disbarred lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the disbarment and may not return to the practice of law unless and until he or she has demonstrated his or her rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case, which may not be filed until five years after the effective date of the disbarment. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Bertha, who was licensed in 2002, was disbarred and he is required to pay certain restitution as a condition of any reinstatement. He converted over $13,000 in client escrow funds, neglected client matters entrusted to him, made scurrilous accusations and threats against judges, lawyers and others, and tendered a false court order and bank statement to a client. |
In re Bertha, David Andre, 2012PR00098
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 11/06/2014 |
| End Date of Disposition | |
| Definition of Disposition | A suspension until further order of the Court reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer has demonstrated rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Bertha, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court for violating the terms of his disciplinary probation. In June, 2014, he was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after four months by an eight-month period of probation subject to conditions. Discipline was originally imposed because he converted $1,000 in earnest money that he was supposed to hold in relation to a real estate matter. |
In re Bertha, David Andre, 2012PR00098
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Probation Revoked |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 11/06/2014 |
| End Date of Disposition | 11/06/2014 |
| Definition of Disposition | Revocation of probation reflects the determination of the Supreme Court that the lawyer has failed to comply with the conditions of probation. The Court may vacate the stayed portion of a suspension and require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of an actual suspension. |
In re Bertha, David Andre, 2012PR00098
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Probation |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 10/06/2014 |
| End Date of Disposition | Probationary condition(s) continue. |
| Definition of Disposition | Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. |
In re Bertha, David Andre, 2012PR00098
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
| Disposition | Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Suspension stayed in part. |
| Effective Date of Disposition | 06/06/2014 |
| End Date of Disposition | 10/06/2014 |
| Definition of Disposition | The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension. |
| Case Summary | Mr. Bertha, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after four months by an eight-month period of probation subject to conditions. He converted $1,000 in earnest money that he was supposed to hold in relation to a real estate matter. The suspension is effective on June 6, 2014. |
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. Disciplinary results displayed above, if any, include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.
ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.
ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.