as of 6/18/2026 2:36:09 AM

James Brian Pierce

J. Brian Pierce & Associates
212 North Canal Street Suite 300
Chicago, Illinois 60606-1303

(312) 207-1410

Not available

Date Admitted

November 05, 1979

Illinois Registration Status

Not authorized to practice law due to discipline and has not demonstrated required MCLE compliance – Last Registered Year: 2007

Malpractice Insurance

No malpractice report as attorney is disciplined

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on
Case Research
to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

In re Pierce, James Brian, 07CH0032
Disposition Suspension for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court
Effective Date of Disposition 11/17/2009
End Date of Disposition
Definition of Disposition A suspension until further order of the Court reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer has demonstrated rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.
Case Summary Mr. Pierce, who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He converted funds from two different personal injury clients. He did not participate in the disciplinary proceeding.
In re Pierce, James Brian, 02CH0088
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Probation
Effective Date of Disposition 03/13/2006
End Date of Disposition 03/13/2007 Probationary condition(s) satisfied.
Definition of Disposition Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension.
In re Pierce, James Brian, 02CH0088
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Suspension for a specified period. Suspension stayed in part.
Effective Date of Disposition 12/13/2005
End Date of Disposition 03/13/2006
Definition of Disposition The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension.
Case Summary Mr. Pierce, who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for five months, with the last two months stayed pending completion of a twelve-month period of probation with conditions. He mismanaged approximately $4,000 in client funds, neglected civil matters, and attempted to conceal the neglect of one client’s matter from the client. The suspension is effective on December 13, 2005.
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. Disciplinary results displayed above, if any, include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.

ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.