Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on

Case Research

to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

Disposition	Disbarment
Effective Date of Disposition	11/17/2004
End Date of Disposition	No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Discipline continues until further order of the Court.
Definition of Disposition	Disbarment is a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct warranting the most serious sanction. The disbarred lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the disbarment and may not return to the practice of law unless and until he or she has demonstrated his or her rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case, which may not be filed until five years after the effective date of the disbarment.
Case Summary	Mr. McAuliffe, who was licensed in 1976, was disbarred. He neglected client matters, failed to turn client files over to successor counsel, failed to communicate with clients and made misrepresentations to multiple clients regarding the status of their matters. He was previously suspended for unrelated misconduct in 2001.

Disposition	Probation Revoked
Effective Date of Disposition	10/30/2003
End Date of Disposition	10/30/2003
Definition of Disposition	Revocation of probation reflects the determination of the Supreme Court that the lawyer has failed to comply with the conditions of probation. The Court may vacate the stayed portion of a suspension and require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of an actual suspension.
Case Summary	Mr. McAuliffe, who was licensed in 1976, was previously suspended by the Court for six months, with all but the first forty-five days stayed by eighteen months of probation with conditions. He failed to prosecute a lawsuit on behalf of clients, misrepresented the status of the matter to the clients, and then paid them approximately $6,200 as a purported settlement of their claim. He also failed to cooperate with the disciplinary investigation. Because he failed to comply with the conditions of his probation, the probation was revoked, the stay of his suspension was vacated, and Mr. McAuliffe was suspended from the practice of law for four and one-half (4.5) months.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition	10/30/2003
End Date of Disposition	03/13/2004
Definition of Disposition	Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.

Disposition	Probation
Effective Date of Disposition	10/30/2003
End Date of Disposition	Probationary condition(s) continue.
Definition of Disposition	Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension.

Disposition	Suspension for a specified period. Suspension stayed in part.
Effective Date of Disposition	06/29/2001
End Date of Disposition	08/13/2001
Definition of Disposition	The Supreme Court may order that, following a suspension, a further period of suspension be stayed, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the further suspension period as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension.