as of 6/18/2026 5:56:36 AM

Christopher Anthony Millet

Law Offices of Christopher A. Millet
10001 W Roosevelt Rd Ste 202
Westchester, Illinois 60154-2600

(708) 681-2420

Not available

Date Admitted

May 31, 1994

Illinois Registration Status

Not authorized to practice law due to discipline and has not demonstrated required MCLE compliance – Last Registered Year: 2005

Malpractice Insurance

No malpractice report as attorney is disciplined

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on
Case Research
to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

In re Millet, Christopher Anthony, 06CH0047
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Disbarment
Effective Date of Disposition 11/22/2011
End Date of Disposition No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Discipline continues until further order of the Court.
Definition of Disposition Disbarment is a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct warranting the most serious sanction. The disbarred lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the disbarment and may not return to the practice of law unless and until he or she has demonstrated his or her rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case, which may not be filed until five years after the effective date of the disbarment.
Case Summary Mr. Millet, who was licensed in 1994, was disbarred. He was convicted of conspiracy to knowingly distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, specifically 500 grams or more of mixtures containing cocaine, and with knowingly attempting to possess with intent to deliver a controlled substance. He masterminded a scheme whereby he partnered with a known drug dealer to steal cash and drugs from another individual he believed to be a drug dealer. He also misappropriated over $22,000 in client funds and neglected a client's case.
In re Millet, Christopher Anthony, 06CH0047
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Interim suspension until further order of the Court
Effective Date of Disposition 08/31/2006
End Date of Disposition 11/22/2011
Definition of Disposition An interim suspension reflects the determination of the Supreme Court that a lawyer should be suspended from the practice of law. In imposing interim suspension, the Court orders that the lawyer be suspended until further order of the Court and may impose such conditions as the Court deems necessary. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the interim suspension. The Court may terminate the interim suspension upon imposition of final discipline or under other circumstances as the Supreme Court deems just.
In re Millet, Christopher Anthony, 05ML6011
Disposition Interim suspension until further order of the Court
Effective Date of Disposition 08/22/2005
End Date of Disposition 08/31/2006
Definition of Disposition An interim suspension reflects the determination of the Supreme Court that a lawyer should be suspended from the practice of law. In imposing interim suspension, the Court orders that the lawyer be suspended until further order of the Court and may impose such conditions as the Court deems necessary. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the interim suspension. The Court may terminate the interim suspension upon imposition of final discipline or under other circumstances as the Supreme Court deems just.
Case Summary Mr. Millet, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. He was charged with felony conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, namely more than 500 grams of mixtures containing cocaine. He was also charged with disposing of a firearm and ammunition to a person who he had cause to believe was under indictment for, or had been convicted of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. Disciplinary results displayed above, if any, include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.

ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.