as of 6/20/2026 3:33:56 AM

Lawrence Joseph Fleming

Lawrence J. Fleming
2001 South Big Bend Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri 63117-2403

(314) 954-1876

Not available

Date Admitted

November 14, 1968

Illinois Registration Status

Not authorized to practice law due to discipline – Last Registered Year: 2014

Malpractice Insurance

No malpractice report as attorney is disciplined

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which case each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on
Case Research
to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in our database. Case Research contains most disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most disciplinary orders and board reports issued since 1990. If Case Research does not contain the information you are seeking, please contact the Commission's Clerk's Office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available under Clerk's Office Services.

In re Fleming, Lawrence Joseph, 2014PR00152
Disposition Disbarment
Effective Date of Disposition 03/12/2015
End Date of Disposition No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Discipline continues until further order of the Court.
Definition of Disposition Disbarment is a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct warranting the most serious sanction. The disbarred lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the disbarment and may not return to the practice of law unless and until he or she has demonstrated his or her rehabilitation, good character, and current knowledge of the law in a subsequent reinstatement case, which may not be filed until five years after the effective date of the disbarment.
Case Summary Mr. Fleming was licensed in Missouri in 1967 and in Illinois in 1968. He was disbarred by the Supreme Court of Missouri for failing to timely file appearances, briefs, writs and responses to motions, making misrepresentations to clients and to disciplinary officials, collecting unreasonable fees and failing to deposit funds into a trust account. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him.
In re Fleming, Lawrence Joseph, 2012PR00089
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Suspension stayed in whole
Effective Date of Disposition 11/19/2012
End Date of Disposition 11/19/2012
Definition of Disposition The Supreme Court may order that a suspension be stayed in whole, typically in connection with an order of probation. A stay defers the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension. Under those circumstances, the stayed suspension does not affect the authority of the lawyer to practice law and the lawyer may practice law during the stayed suspension. If the Court determines that the lawyer has failed to comply with probationary conditions, the Court may vacate the stay and may require that the lawyer actually serve the full suspension.
Case Summary Mr. Fleming was licensed in Missouri in 1967 and in Illinois in 1968. He was suspended in Missouri for six months, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of conditional probation for neglecting two client matters, making misrepresentations to clients, and providing financial assistance to a client in connection with contemplated litigation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, subject to the same conditions imposed in Missouri.
In re Fleming, Lawrence Joseph, 2012PR00089
(One of multiple dispositions on this case)
Disposition Probation
Effective Date of Disposition 11/19/2012
End Date of Disposition No disposition end date scheduled at this time. Probation continues until compliance with probationary condition(s).
Definition of Disposition Probation reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct, but also a finding that the lawyer may continue to practice law pursuant to specified conditions under ARDC supervision without posing a risk to the public, profession, or courts. As a result, the lawyer may continue to practice law during the period of probation, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court. Probation may be ordered for a specified period of time or for a specified period of time and until further order of the Court. Probation may be ordered in conjunction with a suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A stay defers that portion of the suspension as long as the lawyer complies with probationary conditions. If the lawyer successfully completes probation, the lawyer is not actually suspended during any portion of the stayed suspension.
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. Disciplinary results displayed above, if any, include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.

ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. Attorneys may make changes to their contact information on the ARDC’s Online Registration page, or by completing and submitting the Change of Address form available on our Address Changes page. Name changes require the filing of a motion with the Supreme Court. Please consult our Name Change Requests page for details.