|
A. An
Attorney's Ethical Obligations
The ethical importance of the creation and maintenance of the client trust account is rooted in the general principle that a lawyer who holds the funds or property of a client or third person in trust, even if for a brief time or intermittently, has the duty as a fiduciary to safeguard and segregate those assets from the lawyer's personal and business assets.
Rule 1.15 sets forth the ethical duties a lawyer must fulfill in holding the funds of clients or third persons that are received by the lawyer in connection with a representation. The duties set forth in Rule 1.15 are intended to eliminate not only the actual loss of client or third person funds but also their risk of loss while in the lawyer's possession. See In re
Bizar, 97 Ill.2d 127, 132, 454 N.E.2d 271, 273 (1983). To fulfill the duties set forth in Rule 1.15, a lawyer's handling of trust funds must be: (1) separate,
i.e, client or third person funds must be segregated from the lawyer's own property; (2) accountable,
i.e, the lawyer must be easily able to account to the client or third person through updated and accurate records of the funds being held in trust; and (3) identifiable, i.e., the funds being held in trust must be readily recognized as the property of others.
Holding property in trust is a non-delegable, personal fiduciary responsibility as long as that property remains in the lawyer’s possession. This responsibility cannot be transferred and is not excused by ignorance, inattention, incompetence or dishonesty of the lawyer or by the lawyer’s associates or non-lawyer employees. Although a lawyer may employ others, through adequate training and supervision, to assist the lawyer in fulfilling his or her duties under Rule 1.15, the lawyer is solely responsible for ensuring that the duties imposed by Rule 1.15 are being met.
The need to handle with scrupulous care funds entrusted to a lawyer by a client or third person should be self-evident. Nonetheless, cases continue to arise where practicing lawyers, either inadvertently or intentionally, mishandle trust funds, subjecting clients and third persons to the risk of economic hardship and seriously undermining public confidence in the legal profession. The purpose of this Handbook is three-fold:
1. To describe the rules for handling trust funds and property;
2. To provide a practical guide to creating and maintaining the trust account; and
3. To give guidance on certain unresolved questions concerning the handling of trust funds.
The Handbook will serve its purpose if it promotes better safeguarding of trust funds, facilitates greater accountability and reduces the number of complaints annually received relating to the maintenance of trust funds. It is not intended to address all the complex legal issues that might arise when handling client or third person property. To help you find answers to these and other questions about your professional responsibilities, you may call the ARDC Ethics Inquiry Program at (800) 826-8625 or (312) 565-2600, which provides general research and guidance on hypothetical questions regarding ethics issues and the Rules of Professional Conduct. We encourage your input regarding this Handbook or any of its provisions.
B. Disciplinary Treatment of Management of Trust Property and Funds
The primary objectives of the disciplinary system are to safeguard the public and to maintain the integrity of the legal profession. In re Neff, 83 Ill.2d 20, 413 N.E.2d 1282 (1980).
With regards to client trust accounts, twenty-one years ago in In re
Clayter, 78 Ill.2d 276, 278, 399 N.E.2d 1318, 1319 (1980), the Illinois Supreme Court admonished lawyers:
This case presents this court with an opportunity to admonish the bar of the State that it is absolutely impermissible for an attorney to commingle his funds with those of his client or with money he holds as a fiduciary. Unfortunately, many attorneys are either unaware of, or indifferent to, this proscription.
Despite the Court's admonition in Clayter, the mishandling of client funds continues to be a problem. The improper handling of client funds has consistently been the most frequent area alleged in formal complaints filed before the Hearing Board.
In a recent disciplinary case, the Hearing Board observed:
Fourteen years after [the Supreme Court's admonition in
Clayter], we are still contending with attorneys who are either ignorant or scornful of the rule. At some point, something must be done to get the Bar's attention . . . . We hope we are beyond having to discuss the seriousness of commingling, but it bears repeating that the harm to the public is no less if the attorney who commingles does so with a pure heart. The Court observed in In re
Enstrom, 104 Ill.2d 410, 417, 472 N.E.2d 446, 449 (1984) that commingled funds may become subject to the claims of an attorney's creditors or otherwise encumbered by operation of law. A tax lien, insolvency, a dissolution of marriage proceeding, or the death or incapacity of the attorney are just a few events that can tie up a client's assets for years, if not permanently deprive him or her of those assets. As the Court said in In re
Enstrom, 104 Ill.2d 410, 417, 472 N.E.2d 446, 449 (1984): "The rule is intended to guard not only against the actual loss of the funds but also against the risk of loss." Citing In re
Bizar, 97 Ill.2d 127, 132, 454 N.E.2d 271, 273 (1983).
Respondent's assertion that the nature of his practice did not require him to have a client trust account does not excuse his failure to comply with Rule 1.15(a). Had Respondent deposited the check into a separate, identifiable trust account and then disbursed the proceeds promptly upon the written direction of the parties, this case would never have occurred and the funds would have been safe. The risk of loss of client funds strongly militates in favor of strictly enforcing the rules regarding their safekeeping.
(In re Van Beek, 93CH 34 (4/15/94
HB Report at p. 16).
The ARDC investigative staff approach every complaint that suggests the mishandling of client funds as a potentially serious case meriting close scrutiny. Such complaints usually require intensive inspection of a lawyer's account records, related client files, and bank records to assure that no impropriety has occurred.
Where the evidence shows misuse of funds, formal charges will be pursued whether or not the client has ultimately been reimbursed. Sanctions for improper handling of client funds range from censure to disbarment. In any case where the evidence suggests dishonest motives or reckless disregard for the client's or third person’s property, disbarment or a lengthy suspension will be sought.
Whenever a lawyer
holds the property of a client or third person in connection with a
representation, Rule 1.15 applies. Rule 1.15 governs the requirements
and procedures a lawyer must follow while holding that property.
Entitled "Safekeeping Property," Rule 1.15 applies to both funds and
tangible property. Since lawyers are most frequently holding funds on
behalf of a client, this Handbook will discuss the requirements of Rule
1.15 mainly in the context of holding client funds. Nevertheless, the
requirements and duties expressed in Rule 1.15 apply with equal force to
tangible property held in trust by the lawyer. Also, by using the word
“safekeeping” in its title, Rule 1.15 requires the lawyer to do more
than just hold property, the lawyer must take adequate precautions to
“safekeep” or protect the property from actual or potential loss.
A. Definitions
1. "Trust" Account
The word "trust" is used to reflect the fiduciary role in which a lawyer receives or holds property on behalf of a client or a third person. When such property takes the form of funds, the word “trust” is an important label to distinguish those accounts where funds are being held in trust from the accounts containing the lawyer's own property. Gurnett v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York, 356 Ill. 612, 191 N.E. 250 (1934).
2. Commingling
Commingling occurs when a lawyer either deposits funds belonging to a client into the lawyer's own personal or business account or when the lawyer deposits the lawyer’s own personal funds into the trust account where client funds are maintained. In re
Clayter, 78 Ill.2d 276, 399 N.E.2d 1318 (1980).
3. Conversion
Conversion has been defined by the Illinois Supreme Court as " 'any unauthorized act, which deprives a man of his property permanently or for an indefinite time.' " In re
Thebus, 108 Ill.2d 255, 259, 483 N.E.2d 1258 (1985), quoting Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. Mallory, Son & Zimmerman Co., 157 Ill. 554, 563 (1895). Conversion of trust funds occurs when a lawyer uses those funds for a purpose other than that for which they were delivered. Conversion is typically proven when the trust account is either overdrawn or when the lawyer allows the balance in the trust account to become less than the total amount the lawyer is holding in trust, even if the lawyer has other funds. In re Ushijima, 119 Ill.2d 51, 58, 518 N.E.2d 73, 76 (1987); In re
Cheronis, 114 Ill.2d 527, 502 N.E.2d 722 (1986).
4. Client Trust Accounts
It is a "special" bank account, usually a checking or savings account, that is a depository for all funds belonging to clients and other persons coming into the lawyer's possession in connection with a representation. See Rule 1.15(a).
Typically, it will be an account opened on behalf of one client (usually in situations where there is a large amount of money being held for a long period of time), where the
interest earned on the account can be calculated and remitted to the
individual client or it will be a pooled account where the moneys of several clients are
held (usually nominal or short-term funds), where the interest earned on the account goes to the IOLTA program (see discussion of IOLTA accounts below). A lawyer may have one or more trust accounts depending on need.
In determining the type of account to deposit funds for a client, the lawyer or law firm must take into consideration the amount of interest that the funds would earn for a client during the period they are expected to be held, the cost of establishing and maintaining the account, and the capability of the financial institution, through
subaccounting, to calculate and pay interest earned by each client’s funds, net of any transaction costs, to the individual client. See Rule 1.15(e). Regardless of the type of account the lawyer decides to deposit funds, it is axiomatic that a lawyer cannot take the interest earned on the funds held in trust. See In re
Kitsos, 127 Ill.2d 1, 535 N.E.2d 792 (1989).
5. IOLTA Trust Accounts
Nominal or short-term funds of clients or third persons must be deposited in what is called an IOLTA trust account. IOLTA is the acronym for the Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts program run by the Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois, a non-profit corporation incorporated in 1981 by the Illinois State Bar and Chicago Bar associations. IOLTA trust accounts are pooled, interest-bearing or dividend-earning accounts, where the moneys of several clients are being held for different periods of time.
The net interest or dividends earned on IOLTA trust accounts is paid directly to the Lawyers Trust Fund, which uses the money to fund legal assistance and other programs benefitting the public throughout the state, specifically approved by the Supreme Court of Illinois.
The Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois is located at
Two Prudential Plaza, 180 North Stetson
Avenue, Suite 820, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 938-2906 [Main Phone] (312)
938-3091 [Fax] 1-800-624-8962 [Toll Free]. Inquiries concerning the IOLTA program may be directed to Ruth Ann Schmitt, Executive Director, Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois, at the
above address or phone number or you may visit the Lawyers Trust Fund website at
www.ltf.org .
The decision as to whether funds are nominal in amount or are expected to be held for a short period of time rests exclusively within the sound judgment of the lawyer or law firm and no charge of ethical impropriety or breach of professional conduct will result from the lawyer’s or law firm’s judgment on what is nominal or short term. See Rule 1.15(d)(5).
The Lawyers Trust Fund successfully persuaded many financial institutions in Illinois to
waive all or most of the service charges and handling fees on IOLTA
accounts. The Lawyers Trust Fund sends a copy of a listing of
those institutions (the Honor Roll)
each year to every attorney and firm with an IOLTA account. To
obtain a copy of the Honor Roll, please contact the Lawyers Trust Fund
of Illinois at (800) 624-8962 or (312) 938-2906 or visit the Lawyers
Trust Fund website at www.ltf.org.
B. Key Characteristics of Holding Trust Funds and Property
To understand and fulfill the requirements of Rule 1.15, property held in trust must have all of the following three distinct and essential characteristics: 1) separate; 2) accountable; and 3) identifiable. Although Rule 1.15 does not expressly prescribe any particular accounting procedures or methods that lawyers must employ to fulfill the duties of “safekeeping” trust property, a lawyer cannot discharge those duties unless the way in which the property is held in trust can satisfy all of these requirements. See Rule 1.15(a).
1. Separate
All property of clients or third persons that is in a lawyer’s possession must be kept separate from the lawyer’s own property. Funds must be maintained in an account that is separate from the lawyer's personal and business accounts. See Rule 1.15(a). Holding client or third person funds in a safe deposit box, file cabinet or desk drawer is
usually not an acceptable way of safekeeping trust funds and has been condemned by the Supreme Court which has stated that "such a covert method of handling a client's funds is highly unprofessional and one which can only create suspicion and harmful inference." In re
Lingle, 27 Ill.2d 459, 463-64, 189 N.E.2d 342 (1963); In re Ashbach, 13 Ill.2d 411, 419, 150 N.E.2d 119 (1958). Due to the danger of conversion or other risk of loss, "it is essential that a client's money be held in such a manner that there can be no doubt that the lawyer is holding it only for another and that the money does not belong to him personally." In re Johnson, 133 Ill.2d 516, 531, 552 N.E.2d 703, 710 (1989).
Separation:
-
protects the funds from levy by the lawyer's or law firm's creditors, including levy by the IRS (see In re
Enstrom, 104 Ill.2d 410, 415, 472 N.E.2d 446 (1984);
-
allows the account to be found in the event the lawyer becomes ill, incompetent or dies;
-
protects the funds from being considered part of the lawyer's estate in the event the lawyer files for bankruptcy, is going through divorce proceedings or dies; and
-
discourages the lawyer from misappropriating client funds for the lawyer's own personal use.
2. Accountable
The lawyer must be able to make a full and accurate accounting at any time to the client or third person of how much of their funds the lawyer has received, held, and paid out from the trust account. This is done through updated and accurate record keeping. For trust funds, the lawyer MUST be able to tell the client or third person the following:
-
exactly how much monies were deposited;
-
how monies were disbursed; and
-
how much remains in the account for each client or third person on whose behalf the funds are being held.
3. Identifiable
The account must be clearly labeled as a trust account. Therefore, the account must be opened as a trust account, with the checks and deposit slips imprinted with that title. Merely opening an account in the lawyer’s or law firm’s name and treating the account as a trust account is not enough. See In re
Clayter, 78 Ill.2d 276, 281, 399 N.E.2d 1318 (1980) (savings account, which was in the name of respondent who testified that he kept clients' funds in this account and that he had written "clients trust account" on the face of the passbook, was not a separate and identifiable trust account).
Identifying the
account as a trust account serves as notice to the world that the funds
in this account are not the lawyer's or law firm's personal or business
assets and further safeguards the trust funds from any attempts to get
at the lawyer's or law firm's assets through the trust fund account.
C. General Duties
under Rule 1.15
Rule 1.15 imposes several affirmative duties upon lawyers governing their handling of property held in trust for clients or third persons in connection with a representation. Those duties include:
-
Duty to Notify Promptly - A lawyer has a duty to notify clients or third persons promptly upon the receipt of funds or other property in which the client or third person has an interest. The rationale for this duty is that the funds belong to the client or third person and the client or third person must make necessary decisions about what to do with the property which they are entitled to receive. See Rule 1.15(b).
-
Duty to Segregate - This duty requires the lawyer to keep client or third person funds or property separate from the lawyer's own property, so that the property is protected from actual or potential loss.
See Rule 1.15(a).
-
Duty to Maintain Complete Records - A lawyer has a duty to properly maintain complete trust accounting records for a period of no less than seven years after the end of the representation. See Rule 1.15(a); S. Ct. R. 769.
-
Duty to Account to Client - A lawyer has a duty to promptly render a full accounting, upon request, to the client or third person regarding the funds or property held or distributed by the lawyer. See Rule 1.15(b).
-
Duty of Prompt Payment or Delivery of Client or Third Person Property - A lawyer has a duty to promptly pay over or deliver to the client or third person any funds or property that the client or third person is entitled to receive, so that the client or third person can make important decisions about the property. See Rule 1.15(b).
-
Duty to Preserve the Integrity of Client Funds - The single most
important duty in handling trust property is the duty to refrain from
using that property for any purpose whatsoever, other than as directed
by the client or third person. This includes any unauthorized use by the
lawyer of the client's or third person’s funds entrusted to the lawyer,
including not only stealing, but also unauthorized temporary use for the
lawyer's own purpose, whether or not the lawyer derives any personal
gain or benefit. Misappropriation occurs not only when the lawyer uses
the trust funds to pay the lawyer's own personal obligations, but also,
for example, when the lawyer disburses trust funds of one client before
the deposits, which are the source of the disbursement, have cleared,
thereby using one client's funds to pay another client. In re Elias, 114
Ill.2d 321, 499 N.E.2d 1327 (1986).
D.
Disclosure of Trust Accounts under Supreme Court Rule 756 Effective
July 26, 2001, Supreme Court Rule 756 was amended to add a requirement
that each lawyer must report, as part of the annual
registration process any and all trust accounts maintained by the lawyer
during the preceding 12
months. See Supreme Court Rule 756(d). If a lawyer does not
maintain a trust account, the lawyer must state the reason why no such
account is required. S.Ct.R. 756(d). A lawyer who
fails to provide the trust account information required by Supreme Court
756(d) will be deemed not registered for the year and will be
removed from the master roll of lawyers authorized to practice law in
Illinois. See Supreme Court Rule 756(e). The registration
materials, mailed out after October 1 of each year, include a section
to provide the trust account information. Effective January 2005,
the trust account report information sent to the ARDC is considered
private and confidential under Supreme Court Rule 766.
A. Separate Clients Should Be Thought Of As Separate Accounts
As a practical matter, a lawyer need not open a separate trust account for each client's funds. Rather, a lawyer has the discretion under Rule 1.15 to "pool" the funds of more than one client into one or more trust accounts. If the amounts being held in trust are nominal or are expected to be held for a short period of time, the lawyer must deposit the funds into a pooled, interest-bearing IOLTA trust
acccount.
With pooled trust accounts, it is important to keep in mind that while
more than one client's funds are deposited in the trust account, each
client's funds must be thought of and treated as separate. Client A's
funds have nothing to do with Client B's funds. NEVER allow one client's
funds to be used, even momentarily, to satisfy another client's
obligations. Separation is obtained by maintaining a separate log or
client ledger sheet for each client. In this way, the lawyer will be
able to account exactly for all money received or paid out on behalf of
each client at any given time.
B. You Can't Spend What You Don't Have or Timing
Is Everything
A deposit in the trust account cannot be disbursed until the deposited item has cleared the banking process and been credited to the trust account. The funds in the trust account cannot be used by anyone other than the client or third person who owns them, and the lawyer is responsible for assuring that the funds are not, even inadvertently, diverted to another. The rule of uncollected funds is simply: if you write a check from the trust account after you have deposited a check or draft on behalf of a particular client, but before the deposited monies have cleared the banking process and have been credited to the trust account, if the check is presented, either it will bounce or you will be drawing on funds which belong to other clients. This is considered conversion even if you have no dishonest motive and no client is ultimately harmed. In re
Clayter, 78 Ill.2d 276, 283, 399 N.E.2d 1318 (1980) Conversion is defined as any unauthorized use of trust funds that deprives the client or third person of the use of those funds even temporarily. See In re Lenz, 108 Ill.2d 445, 484 N.E.2d 1093 (1985).
For example, do not be tempted to do your client a favor by writing a check to the client for settlement proceeds before the settlement check has cleared on the theory that there is other money in the trust account. By doing so, you are putting other clients’ funds are risk. See In re Reeves, 93 SH 599
(M.R. 11056, May 26, 1995) (lawyer suspended for, inter alia, conversion of client funds where the lawyer would often issue a client a check drawn on the trust account prior to the deposited settlement check clearing and its proceeds being posted to the trust account. His clients would frequently cash their checks on the same day the trust account check was issued and the lawyer's bank would pay out on the check from the funds currently in the account belonging to other clients).
Therefore, it is important to know the financial institution’s check clearing procedures and schedules of when funds can be withdrawn. The time it takes for funds to become available after deposit can vary between a day to several weeks depending on the form in which the money is deposited. Ask your financial institution for their schedule of when deposits are posted to the account. Many banks have automated account information systems where you can check the activity on an account.
Practice Tip: Normally, checks will be presumed good and many financial institutions will automatically honor and credit a deposit a certain number of banking days after deposit without actually having received verification from the drawee bank that the funds have been paid. In such cases, the lawyer can safely disburse funds against the check when the lawyer’s bank credits the deposit to the account. However, even after an item has been posted to an account, it still may be returned due to insufficient funds, stop payment or improper endorsement and a lawyer may not learn of the dishonor until several days after the item was posted. When a lawyer has
any concerns that a check might be dishonored, the safest way to determine that an item has cleared is to copy the deposited check and call the bank upon which it is drawn to find out if the item has been honored. Real Estate Transactions: Lawyers who act as the closing agents for real estate transactions face the dilemma of the commercial necessity of immediately issuing checks from the trust account on funds that have not even been deposited, much less cleared the banking process. In late 1998, the Supreme Court added Rule 1.15(g) to permit
lawyers in the closing of a real estate transaction to disburse funds
deposited, but not yet collected, so long as the lawyer deposited the
funds into a segregated Real Estate Funds Account (REFA), established
prior to the closing and maintained solely for the receipt and
disbursement of such funds. Also, the lawyer must either be acting
as a closing agent as prescribed in subparagraph (g)(1) or the
instrument for deposit must meet the "good-funds" requirements
set forth in subparagraph (g)(2). However, while the rule protects
a lawyer from any disciplinary consequences in this context, a lawyer
would remain civilly liable if any deposit does not clear.
C. Always Maintain
a Paper Trail
Accountability requires that all aspects of the transaction be traceable from the time of receipt of the funds, up to and including the disbursement of the funds by check, proper negotiation of that check by the payee and clearance through the banking process. In the typical transaction, where the client gives money to the lawyer, who then deposits it in the client trust account and pays the money out at the direction of the client, the following documents would provide a paper trail for the lawyer of what actions were taken:
-
the initial deposit slip or copy of a bank receipt, which would show the date of deposit, the amount of deposit, the name of the client on whose behalf the money has been received, the source of the funds and the date stamp showing the date the deposit was received by the bank;
-
the bank statement, which would show that the bank credited the deposit and when it was credited;
-
the checkbook stub, which would show when disbursements were made and to whom;
-
the disbursement check, which would show the date it was drawn, the amount and the name of the payee, the purpose of the check, the order of negotiation (from the endorsements) and the date deposited for collection;
-
the bank statement, which would show the date the trust account was actually charged for the check; and
-
any file documentation that would explain the deposit or the authority for how the money should be distributed, such as a closing statement, a court order or a signed authorization by the client for the disbursement of funds.
Each deposit and
disbursement should describe the client and matter to which it relates.
D. There Is No
Such Thing a Negative Balance
All balances are
either positive (while monies are being held for clients) or zero (when
the matter is closed and no monies remain in the trust account). The
balance in the trust account should always equal the aggregate balance
due all clients. In re Young, 111 Ill.2d 98, 488 N.E.2d 1014 (1986). If
a negative balance occurs, it is, at best, a sign of negligence and, at
worst, a sign of theft.
A. Property Held
in the Client Trust Account
1. What MUST be held in a Client Trust Account?
-
All funds or property belonging to a client or third person entrusted to the lawyer in connection with a representation, regardless of whether the lawyer regularly handles trust funds. E.g., filing fees; costs of retaining an investigator or expert; money to pay the client's creditors; rents collected on behalf of the client.
-
All funds to which both the lawyer and client claim an interest arising out of the course of the legal representation. E.g., settlement funds; bond refund checks.
-
All funds in which both the client and a third person have an interest which come into the lawyer's possession during the representation of the client. E.g., escrow funds held back in a real estate closing; escrow funds held pending the disposition of property in a divorce proceeding.
-
Prepayments for legal services where, under the terms of the fee agreement with the client, the advanced fees remain the client's money until the lawyer has performed services and the client agrees to the amount of fees earned and authorizes disbursement.
2. What funds MAY be held in a Client Trust Account?
-
Funds of the lawyer that are reasonably necessary to meet the bank's minimum balance requirements to open or maintain an IOLTA or
non-IOLTA trust account or to pay bank charges and fees for non-IOLTA trust accounts.
3. What funds MUST NOT be held in a Client Trust Account?
-
Lawyer's own personal funds.
-
Lawyer's business and investment monies.
-
Payments for fees which, under the fee agreement with the client, are the property of the lawyer upon payment.
4. What MUST go into an IOLTA Trust Account?
Client funds that are nominal in amount or expected to be held for a short period of time are to be deposited into one or more "pooled" interest-bearing trust accounts
with the interest paid to the Lawyers Trust Fund (Rule 1.15(d)). E.g., most settlement funds are considered to be short-term since they should be promptly paid to the client once the settlement check has cleared.
Rule 1.15 provides that the decision as to whether funds are long-term or short-term, substantial or nominal, rests in the sound judgment of the lawyer and no charge of ethical impropriety or other breach of professional conduct shall arise out of the lawyer's judgment on what is nominal or short-term (Rule 1.15(d)(5)).
Rule 1.15(e) sets forth the factors a lawyer shall take into consideration in exercising discretion as to whether funds should be deposited into an IOLTA or
non-IOLTA account. For example:
-
the amount of interest which the funds would earn during the period they are expected to be deposited;
-
the cost of establishing and administering the account, including the cost of the lawyer's services; or
-
the capability of the financial institution, through
subaccounting, to calculate and pay interest earned by each client's funds, net of any transaction costs, to the individual client.
5. Where Are Retainers and Advances for Fees Deposited?
[Revised as of July 27, 2007]
Rule 1.15(d) requires that
money advanced by a client for “costs and expenses” is the client’s
property and, therefore, must be deposited in the lawyer’s trust
account. However, the question of where to deposit advanced fees,
general retainers, or flat or minimum fees is not explicitly addressed
in Rule 1.15. Adding to this uncertainty is the fact that up until
recently there was little guidance on whether an advance fee paid by a
client for legal services to be rendered in the future remained the
client’s property until the services were performed, thereby
necessitating that the advance be deposited in the trust account, or
became the lawyer’s immediately upon payment, in which case, the lawyer
could not deposit the advance in trust account but rather in the
lawyer’s own account.
On May 3, 2007, the Illinois
Supreme Court issued an opinion, in a case of first impression,
recognizing the viability of advance payment retainers
in Illinois. Before today, only two types of retainers were explicitly
recognized by the Court: classic and security interest
retainers. Brian
Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc., et al. (DLA Piper Rudnick
Gray Cary (US), LLP), No. 102578, 2007 WL 1288279 (Ill.
May 3) (pet. for reh’g. pending).
The .pdf format copy at the Court’s website:
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/SupremeCourt/2007/May/102578.pdf.
A classic retainer,
also referred to as a true or general retainer, is paid by a client to
the lawyer in order to secure the lawyer’s availability during a
specified period of time or for a specified matter. This type of
retainer is earned when paid and immediately becomes property of the
lawyer, regardless of whether the lawyer ever actually performs any
services for the client.
Under a security
retainer arrangement, funds paid to the lawyer are not considered
present payment for future services. Rather, the retainer remains the
property of the client until the lawyer applies it to charges for
services that are actually rendered. Any unearned funds are refunded to
the client. The purpose of a security retainer is to secure payment of
fees for future services that the lawyer is expected to perform.
Pursuant to Rule 1.15(a) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct,
a security retainer must be deposited in a trust account and kept
separate from the lawyer’s own property.
The Court acknowledged that lawyers can get an advance payment
retainer from a client. This type of retainer consists of a present
payment to the lawyer in exchange for the commitment to provide legal
services in the future. Ownership of this retainer passes to the lawyer
immediately upon payment. In concluding that the Illinois will now
recognize this third type of retainer, the Court cited as persuasive
authority the Client Trust Account Handbook (ARDC 2001).
Our handbook explicitly recognizes the distinction between security
retainers and advance fee payments.
“[W]ith advance fee
payments, the client agrees to pay in advance for some or all of the
services that the lawyer is expected to perform on a particular
legal problem. The prepayment is applied against the lawyer’s hourly
fee and the lawyer spends down the retainer as services are
rendered. In Illinois, unless otherwise provided by statute or court
order, the specific terms of the fee agreement with the client
determine whether such prepayments remain the client’s funds and
must be deposited in the trust account until earned or whether they
are the lawyer’s funds and therefore must not be placed in the trust
account. If a lawyer and a client agree in writing or orally that
the lawyer will deposit the prepayment in the client trust account
and bill against it as the representation proceeds, the funds remain
the property of the client and must be deposited in the trust
account. Withdrawals can be made only with notice to and agreement
of the client. On the other hand, if the lawyer and client agree
that the prepayment is immediate compensation for the lawyer’s
commitment to perform future services, e.g., a flat fee
agreement, the funds are the property of the lawyer and may be
deposited in the lawyer’s operating or business account.”
Client Trust Account Handbook, pt. IV (A)(5).
Slip op. at 9.
The Court ruled that any written retainer agreement, regardless of the
type of retainer contemplated, should clearly define the kind of
retainer being paid. If the parties agree that the client will pay a
security retainer, that term should be used in the agreement; it should
also state that the funds remain the property of the client until used
to pay for services rendered and that the funds will be deposited in a
client trust account. If the parties determine that an advance payment
retainer best meets the client’s needs, the written agreement must use
that term and clearly state that the funds become the property of the
lawyer when paid and that they will not be held in a client trust
account.
Importantly, “advance payment retainer agreements must be in
writing and they must clearly disclose to the client the nature
of the retainer, where it will be deposited, and how the lawyer or law
firm will handle withdrawals from the retainer in payment for services
rendered.” (Slip op. at 12; emphasis supplied). Further, the Court
ruled that:
A written agreement
providing for an advance payment retainer must contain language
advising the client of the option to place his or her money into a
security retainer. The agreement must clearly advise the client that
the choice of the type of retainer to be used is the client’s alone;
provided, however, that if the attorney is unwilling to represent
the client without receiving an advance payment retainer, the
agreement must so state, including the attorney’s reasons therefor.
In addition, an advance payment retainer agreement must set forth
the special purpose behind the retainer and explain why an advance
payment retainer is advantageous to the client.
Finally, in the event that
the parties’ intent cannot be gleaned from the language of their
agreement, we conclude that the agreement must be construed as
providing for a security retainer....construing an unclear retainer
agreement to establish a security retainer will provide the greatest
protection for a client’s funds, since they will not be subject to
the lawyer’s creditors and withdrawals from the funds may be made
only with notice to and agreement of the client. Reimbursement to
the client of any unearned fees may also be facilitated by
construing an unclear agreement as a security retainer, since the
funds must be held separate from the lawyer’s own funds. See Client
Trust Account Handbook pt. IV(A)(5).”
Slip op. at 13.
Rule 1.15(d) requires that money advanced by a client for "costs and expenses" be deposited in the lawyer's trust account. However, the question of where to deposit advanced fees, general retainers, or flat or minimum fees is not explicitly addressed in either Rule 1.15 or by Illinois Supreme Court precedent. The decision of where such funds must be deposited is determined by an application of the principles of Rule 1.15 to the terms of the fee agreement.
A retainer fee can have one of two purposes. It can be a fee prepaid by the client for the lawyer's agreement to be available to provide legal services when needed during a specified time period, or it can be an advance deposit for some or all of the legal services to be rendered in the future representation.
It is well-established that payments made to ensure the lawyer's availability are earned when paid since the lawyer is entitled to the money regardless of whether he or she ever actually performs any services for the client. Such types of retainers are variously called the "true," "classic," or "general" retainer. A typical example of such a retainer is where a business pays a lawyer a monthly or annual fee to be available to review contracts, answer questions, and consult on any legal matter that arises during the defined time period. Because this type of retainer is earned upon receipt by the lawyer, it must not be deposited into the lawyer's client trust account, but may be deposited into the lawyer's business account.
In contrast, with advance fee payments, the client agrees to pay in advance for some or all of the services that the lawyer is expected to perform on a particular legal problem. The prepayment is applied against the lawyer's hourly fee and the lawyer spends down the retainer as services are rendered. In Illinois, unless otherwise provided by statute or court order, the specific terms of the fee agreement with the client determine whether such prepayments remain the client's funds and must be deposited in the trust account until earned or whether they are the lawyer's funds and therefore must not be placed in the trust account.
If a lawyer and a client agree in writing or orally that the lawyer will deposit the prepayment in the client trust account and bill against it as the representation proceeds, the funds remain the property of the client and must be deposited in the trust account. Withdrawals can be made only with notice to and agreement of the client. On the other hand, if the lawyer and client agree that the prepayment is immediate compensation for the lawyer's commitment to perform future
services, e.g., a flat fee agreement, the funds are the property of the lawyer and may be deposited in the lawyer's operating or business account.
Difficulties of interpretation arise where the lawyer and client do not have an explicit agreement. The Illinois Supreme Court has not definitively addressed the issue of whether advance fee payments in such cases constitute client funds or property of the lawyer for purposes of determining where the payments must be deposited. Nevertheless, in one case, the Court concluded that an unearned retainer paid as consideration for expected legal services did not constitute client funds. In re Taylor, 66 Ill.2d. 567, 363 N.E.2d 845, 848 (1977). Other courts and sources also characterize Illinois as holding the view that advanced fee payments do not constitute client funds unless the fee agreement specifically provides that the payment is to be held in the trust account. In re McDonald Bros. Construction Co., 114
B.R. 989, 997-98 (1990) citing ISBA Op. No. 703 (1980); see ABA/BNA Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct, sec. 45:109-110, at p. 13-14 (1993);
Brickman, Lester, The Advance Fee Payment Dilemma: Should Payments Be Deposited to the Client Trust Account or to the General Office Account?, 10 Cardozo
L.Rev. 647, 650 fn. 20 (1989). See also ISBA Op. No. 90-10 (1991); ABA
Model Rule 1.15(c), added in February 2002, expressly provides that
legal fees and expenses paid in advance must be deposited in the trust
account and withdrawn as fees are earned or expenses incurred. .
Because the character of the funds is determined by the fee agreement, it is wisest and most consistent with a lawyer's fiduciary obligations to assure that you and the client explicitly agree on how the advanced fees should be held and to reduce that agreement to writing. If you do not do so, you risk being second-guessed, in hindsight, often when your relationship with the client has soured, when there is a disagreement about what services were promised, and when the retainer has already been spent. Bear in mind that Rule 1.5(b) requires that when the lawyer has not regularly represented the client, the basis or rate of the fee shall be communicated to the client before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation.
A word of caution -- no matter where a lawyer deposits advanced fees, it is subject to a lawyer's duty to refund any unearned fees under Rule 1.16(e). A client has an unqualified right to discharge a lawyer. If a client discharges you after having paid a fee advance or flat fee, you can retain only a sum that is reasonable in light of the services you performed prior to being discharged and in light of the factors set forth in Rule 1.5. The remainder must be promptly refunded to the client. Violations of that duty are a relatively frequent subject of formal disciplinary charges.
If you want to
avoid ethical problems arising from the handling of advanced fees, you
should not spend any part of the advance that has not been earned,
regardless of whether the retainer must be held in the trust account.
For retainers that may be deposited in the lawyer's own business
accounts, some lawyers find it a better practice to establish a separate
office account for fees in addition to an operating account. Such
retainers are then deposited in the fee account and funds are
transferred to the operating account only after the fees have been
earned.
B. Unclaimed Client Funds and Unidentified Excesses
Situations may arise where there is an excess amount of funds in the trust account due to (1) the disappearance of a client before a trust account check could have been issued to the client; (2) a client who has not cashed a trust account check; or (3) an unexplained amount of money that cannot be traced as belonging to either a client or the lawyer. Whatever the situation, the bottom line is that the lawyer is not entitled to take the money.
Where the client has disappeared before the lawyer has issued a check to the client, the lawyer must first take all reasonable steps to locate the client. How much effort a lawyer must undertake to find the missing client will vary in each case. Typically, a lawyer would check with the post office to see if the client left a forwarding address. The lawyer would then send a letter to the client’s last known address by regular mail and by certified return receipt advising the client that the lawyer is holding the client’s funds and asking the client for direction in disbursing the money. In cases where a great deal of money is involved, the lawyer may have to contact the client’s relatives, employers, neighbors and friends, publish notice in places the client might frequent, use an investigator or check with the Social Security Administration. See Michigan State Bar Opinion RI-38 (November 20, 1989).
If the client cannot be located and the funds have remained unclaimed by the client for five years, under the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, 765 ILCS
secs. 1025/1 et seq. (1992), the funds are presumed abandoned and the lawyer may remit the funds to the Illinois Unclaimed Property Division of the Illinois State Treasurer. See ISBA Op. No. 845 (Nov. 8, 1983) (what to do with client funds when client cannot be located); see also In re
Walner, 119 Ill.2d 511, 525, 519 N.E.2d 903 (1988) (censure given to lawyer who settled client's claim without consent and
endorsed client's name on and release and settlement check, without authorization, where no prejudice resulted and attorney acted out of a "misguided sense of efficiency"); ISBA Op. No. 95-11 (January 1996) (absent a narrowly drawn power of attorney, a law firm cannot negotiate a check on behalf of a missing client). For further information on remitting unclaimed property to the state, you may call the Unclaimed Property Division at (217) 782-4072 or go to the State Treasurer website at
www.cashdash.net.
The same analysis applies if a trust account check was issued but not cashed by the client. The lawyer should contact the client at the client’s last known address and advise the client that the client has not cashed the trust account check and that unless the client advises the lawyer to issue a replacement check, the funds will be presumed to be abandoned in accordance with the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act and the funds will be remitted to the Illinois Unclaimed Property Division.
Sometimes
ownership of the funds cannot be traced to either a client or the lawyer
typically due to a mathematical error. In these situations, if the
lawyer cannot determine with any reasonable certainty if the amount left
over in the account belongs to either the lawyer or a client, the safest
course is to treat the funds as abandoned property and proceed as
discussed above.
C. Bank Charges and Fees
For non-IOLTA trust accounts, the lawyer may deposit a reasonably sufficient amount of the lawyer's own funds to pay necessary bank charges and fees. See Hazard, G. and
Hodes, W., The Law of Lawyering, sec. 1:15:200, at p. 457 (2 ed. 1992 supp.).
Although
not provided for in Illinois Rule 1.15, ABA Model Rule 1.15(b), amended
February 2002, makes it permissible for a lawyer to deposit the lawyer’s
own funds in the trust account to the extent necessary to pay bank
charges on the account. A lawyer should maintain accurate records of
the lawyer’s deposit of such funds. See Comment [2] to ABA Model Rule
1.15. For IOLTA trust accounts, the Lawyers Trust Fund will pay for
ordinary, account-generated bank charges and fees out of the interest earned. However, IOLTA cannot pay for
certain charges such as NSF, stop payment or bank reconciliation charges
or "special" services such as wire transfers; these charges are the lawyer's own responsibility. The Lawyers Trust Fund has an “Honor Roll” list of financial institutions that have agreed to either reduce or eliminate their
service charges
on IOLTA accounts. A copy of the “Honor Roll” may be obtained by calling the Lawyers Trust
service at (800) 624-8962 or (312) 372-5906 or from the Lawyers Trust Fund website at
www.ltf.org.
Additionally, for either IOLTA or non-IOLTA
trust accounts, a lawyer may maintain a sufficient amount of the
lawyer's own funds in the trust account if this amount is required by the bank to open or maintain a minimum
balance.
D. Trust Property Other Than Cash
When the lawyer receives non-cash trust property, as with money held in trust, the lawyer must (1) identify or label it as such; (2) keep it separate from the lawyer's own property; and (3) take appropriate safeguards to protect and preserve it. This means that the lawyer should identify and label the client property promptly upon receipt and place it in a safe deposit box or other place of safekeeping as soon as possible. The safe deposit box, like the trust account, should bear a label that clearly identifies it as the repository of property not belonging to the lawyer but property held in trust on behalf of clients, such as “Clients’ Safe Deposit Box,” and must not contain any of the lawyer’s property.
The lawyer must also keep records that sufficiently describe the items that are being held in trust, for whose benefit, and where they are being held. Below is an example of the type of record that should be made with respect to items being held in a safe deposit box:
Trust Safe Deposit Receipt
Received this _____day of _____, 19__, by _________________.
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
(Description of item(s) being placed into safe deposit box -- if items are numbered such as stocks or bonds, specify numbers.)
Item(s) being held in trust for:
____________________________________ Firm
Name: _________________________________________________
Client Name:________________________________________________
Item(s) being placed into safe deposit box by:________________________ Any questions regarding contents should be addressed to:
_______________
Name and Address of Bank Where Safe Deposit Located ______________________
Safe Deposit Box ID Number: ________________
Anticipated period item(s) will be held:_____________________
A. Practice Tips for Opening and Operating the Trust Account
-
Form - Generally, the trust account can be a savings account, checking account or certificate of deposit at a federally insured bank or savings and loan. For IOLTA trust accounts, the account must be an interest-bearing account and an account that is subject to withdrawal promptly upon
request (a corporate/business checking account, such as a NOW
account). See Rule 1.15(d)(1).
-
Location - The account must be maintained in
the state where the lawyer's office is located or elsewhere with the
client's consent. See Rule 1.15(a). If the trust account
is located outside of Illinois because the lawyer is licensed and
practices in that other jurisdiction, care must taken that the trust account complies with that state’s trust accounting rules. See Rule 8.5(b) (choice of law). In situations where the client wants the trust account opened for the client’s benefit in another state, it is advisable to get the client’s consent in writing.
For IOLTA trust accounts, the trust account must be established
with a federally insured bank, savings bank or savings and loan
association authorized by federal or state law to do business in
Illinois. See Rule 1.15(d)(1).
Practice Tip: Know Your Financial Institution - Go to a financial institution that does business with lawyers and knows something about lawyers’ trust accounts. The “Honor Roll” of banks complied by the Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois is a good place to start. Talk to other lawyers. Know the financial institution’s charges and fees for maintaining such accounts and have a copy of the account agreement with the financial institution. Know the financial institution’s schedules for posting and crediting deposits. Know what the federally insured limits are on deposits. Investigate the financial institution's requirements for opening and maintaining a trust account such as the minimum balance to earn interest, bank charges to handle the account, check printing charges, and the collection process to clear intrastate and interstate checks and other instruments.
The Lawyers Trust Fund website (www.ltf.org)
has a section on its site with information for financial institutions
describing the IOLTA program, the forms necessary to set up an IOLTA
account and how interest is to be reported and remitted.
-
Naming the Trust Account - An IOLTA trust
account would bear the lawyer or law firm's name and include the
designation "Client Trust Account," "Client Escrow
Account," "Attorney Trust Account" or "Real Estate
Funds Account" (as provided in Rule 1.15(g)) or any other name which would clearly identify it as a trust account. Illinois does not require a particular form of identification on the trust account but the name of the account must be sufficiently clear to serve as notice to the world that it is a trust account and not an account belonging to the attorney.
See Rule 1.15(a). For IOLTA accounts, do not identify the
Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois as designee, trustee or owner of the
account. For non-IOLTA trust accounts, which are opened for the benefit of
a particular client,
the name of the account would include that fact.
-
Opening an IOLTA Trust Account - For an IOLTA account, the
lawyer or firm enrolls in the IOLTA program by completing the sign-up
forms (Notice to Financial Institution to Establish IOLTA Account,
Notice of Enrollment and Interest Remittance Report) and submitting the
forms to the bank. The enrollment forms instruct the bank to
establish an IOLTA account. The taxpayer identification number
(TIN) on the account is the Lawyers Trust Fund of Illinois. The
IOLTA sign-up forms may be downloaded from the Lawyers Trust Fund
website at www.ltf.org or obtained by
contacting the Lawyers Trust Fund at (800) 624-8962 or (312) 938-2906.
-
Select Trust Account Checks that are Distinguishable from Business Account Checks - Select checks that have the trust account name on them and are of a different color than those of the operating account so that checks written on the trust account can be more easily distinguished from checks written on the attorney's operating account. Also, some lawyers maintain their business and personal accounts at a different financial institution from where they have their trust accounts so that no trust account moneys will be inadvertently accessed.
-
Select Signatories with Care - Illinois does not prohibit a lawyer from delegating check-signing authority to someone other than the lawyer. However, the lawyer has a non-delegable duty to protect and preserve the funds in the trust account (see In re
Vrodolyk, 137 Ill.2d 407, 560 N.E.2d 840 (1990)) and can be disciplined for failure to supervise subordinates. See In re
Waddy, 95 CH 686 (M.R. 13084, January 30, 1997).
Practice Tip: You should have a practice where you reconcile all of your accounts on at least a monthly basis, regardless of whether you do your own accounting or you have someone assisting you. If you fail to reconcile, you may not be aware of bank errors, miscalculations and employee embezzlement. See discussion on monthly trust account reconciliation
below.
-
Avoid ATM Withdrawals - Because the lawyer has a duty to account to the client or third person as to how the trust property was handled, writing a check from the trust account creates an automatic audit trail that makes it easy to trace who the money came from and where it went. A trust account with ATM access makes it possible for a lawyer and anyone else with the access code to withdraw the client’s money in cash and it is very hard to account for cash. ATMs are an audit trail disaster. With an ATM withdrawal, the only record of what happened to the money is a little slip of paper that shows the date and the amount of the withdrawal; there is nothing that shows which client’s or third person’s money was withdrawn, who withdrew it or to whom the money was paid. ATM withdrawals are a bad practice for all purposes, including withdrawing lawyers’ fees, since there is no paper trail recording the case from which the fees are owed. Even if you put all the descriptive information on an ATM receipt, it is not good proof of what happened to the money if there is an ARDC investigation.
-
Don’t Share Trust Accounts With Lawyers Not in the Same Firm
- A lawyer has a non-delegable fiduciary duty to safeguard client or third person property entrusted to the lawyer during a representation. If you are in a law firm, each lawyer in the law firm need not open up a separate trust account for each lawyer in the firm. However, you must not allow lawyers that are not in your law firm to deposit trust funds into the law firm’s trust account; you are responsible for those funds. Conversely, if you deposit funds entrusted to you by a client or third person for safekeeping, you cannot deposit those funds into another lawyer’s trust account.
-
If a Mistake Happens, Don’t Panic - If you find that an error occurred in making calculations or deposits, don’t panic. Take remedial action. Call your financial institution. Failure to act not only may compound the problem but failure to notify the financial institution of any errors, forgeries, unauthorized signatures or alterations within a certain period of time may waive all claims that you may have against the financial institution regarding these problems.
-
Do Not Withdraw Your Fees in the Form of Trust Checks Payable for Your Own Personal Expenses
- Only client related charges, such as court costs, expert witness fees or lawyers’ fees, may be paid out of the trust account. The lawyer should not withdraw
earned fees from the trust account in the form of trust checks payable
to the lawyer’s own creditors. An earned fee must be withdrawn
promptly from the trust account and deposited in the lawyer's own
personal or business account. For example, a trust check made
payable to the gas or electric company to pay the lawyer's gas or
electric bill creates the appearance that the lawyer is using the trust account as a personal account and thereby endanger its status as a trust account, or
that the lawyer is using client funds for personal purposes.
-
Let Deposits Clear Before Writing Checks -
The important thing to remember is that disbursing funds before the deposit has cleared puts other clients’ funds at risk of loss, thereby resulting in conversion. See discussion “You Can’t Spend What You Don’t Have or Timing is Everything”
above.
Withdraw Your Fees Promptly from the Trust Account Once You have Earned Them -
When a fee has been earned, the lawyer must promptly write a
check, payable to the lawyer or the lawyer's law firm, for the full
amount of the fee earned. The lawyer must not let earned fees
accumulate in the trust account and withdraw fees on an "as
needed" basis; otherwise, commingling occurs and, consequently,
the trust funds are put at risk. Also, the appearance is
created that the lawyer is hiding money in the account to avoid
creditors or income taxes. In which case, the trust account
could be subject to attachment or levy by the lawyer's
creditors.
Have an Accounting System - You must have a way of accounting to a client or third persons as to how their funds were handled. Rule 1.15 does not prescribe any particular accounting system or method. Some common accounting record systems are discussed below. However, you must have a system that you and anyone else looking at your records can understand. If you don’t know how to set up an accounting system, consult with an accountant. See In re
Sebela, 92 CH 577 (M.R.
10859, March 27, 1995) (conversion of client funds occurred because lawyer
had no accounting system, withdrew his fees on an "as needed"
basis based on his memory and,
consequently, paid himself more than what he was entitled).
A. Accounting Systems
Rule 1.15 requires lawyers to do more than just deposit client or third person funds into a separate and identifiable account, the lawyer must also be able to account to that client or third person concerning how their property was handled by the lawyer.
Rule 1.15 does not specify which types of accounting records or books must be maintained in order for the lawyer to fulfill the duty to give an accurate and complete accounting to the client or third person. There are various manual and automated accounting systems that are available. In the first instance, many lawyers will consult with an accountant to set up an appropriate accounting system. Whichever accounting method or system is used it must be one that the lawyer understands, puts into practice, and follows (and that others auditing the lawyer’s account can follow).
1. Computer Accounting Software
There are some computer accounting software packages that lawyers have used in their trust accounting.
Two commonly used trust accounting programs are Quicken® and
QuickBooks. The Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional
Responsibility published two instructional guides for using either
program. The brochure, Instructions for Using Quicken 5.0® with
Windows 95 or Windows 3.1 for Maintaining, Balancing and Reconciling
Minnesota Lawyer Trust Accounts (April 1996), can be obtained by
calling (651) 296-3952. The guide for using QuickBooks can be
viewed and printed from the Minnesota Bar’s website (http://www2.mnbar.org/qbguide/qbguide.htm). To guard against the potential loss of such computer-stored data, some experts suggest that you print out a hard copy of each client ledger on a monthly basis. See S.Ct.Rule 769 (Maintenance of Records). Also, it is suggested that you back up the data onto disks on a regular basis.
2. Manual Accounting System
Generally, most basic accounting systems will use these accounting books:
-
Cash receipts journal. This lists all receipts chronologically for all clients and identifies the date and source of each receipt.
CASH
RECEIPTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. ____________________ |
| DATE |
SOURCE |
CLIENT |
DEPOSIT |
AMOUNT |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
-
Cash disbursements journal. This journal lists chronologically all trust account disbursements and identifies the recipient, purpose and date of each disbursement.
CASH
DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. _________________ |
| DATE |
CHECK |
PAYEE |
PURPOSE |
CLIENT |
AMOUNT |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Client subsidiary ledger. This ledger records chronologically for each client all receipts, disbursements and balances, and includes:
1. Separate page for each client.
2. Posting transactions (receipts and disbursements) by date, purpose and amount.
3. If the account is a separate one for the client's benefit or if the account allocates interest to each client, any net interest (accrued interest less service charges) credited to the client.
|
CLIENT
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
Name of Client:
_____________________________________
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: ___________________________
File or Case Number: ________________________________ |
| DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS
PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Checkbook register. A trust account checkbook register is like any other checkbook register. It records deposits and trust account checks in sequential order. It also maintains a running balance.
|
CHECKBOOK
REGISTER |
| CHECK |
DATE |
PAYEE
OR DEPOSIT SOURCE |
AMOUNT
OF CHECK |
DEPOSIT
AMOUNT |
BALANCE |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Retention of Records
All financial records related to the lawyer's practice of law must be maintained for a minimum of seven years after the fiduciary obligation ends (Rule 1.15(a); S.Ct.Rule 769). Financial records include, but are not limited to, bank statements, time and billing records, checks, check stubs, journals, ledgers, audits, financial statements, tax returns and tax reports
(S.Ct.Rule 769(2)).
B. Depositing Trust Account Funds
1. Deposit client funds in the trust account promptly upon receipt. Generate the following:
a. Deposit slip, (receipt for cash), which identifies client or file for whom deposit is being made;
b. Checkbook register deposit entry;
c. Client subsidiary ledger entry; and
d. Cash receipts journal entry.
2. Checks payable jointly to the client and the lawyer should be deposited in the trust account and not endorsed over to the client.
1. Disbursements to the client or on behalf of the client must be made promptly after the deposit has been credited. Generate the following:
-
Check made payable to the client or third party, with notation of the client matter and purpose in memo portion of the check;
-
Checkbook register disbursement entry;
-
Client subsidiary ledger entry; and
-
Cash disbursements journal entry.
2. Proper Methods For Withdrawing Legal Fees
-
Before an earned legal fee may properly be withdrawn from a trust account, the client should be given notice of the nature of the services rendered and the amount of the legal fee proposed to be paid to the lawyer. See In re Smith, 63 Ill.2d 250, 347 N.E.2d 133 (1976). If no objection is received within a reasonable time, the lawyer may withdraw the fee from the trust account.
-
Moreover, if no dispute over the fee exists, the lawyers' fees which are justly due and owing, may not remain in the trust account, but MUST be promptly withdrawn. If not, the lawyer is commingling his or her own funds with the clients' funds and, as a consequence, is endangering the integrity of the trust account. See In re
Enstrom, 104 Ill.2d 410, 472 N.E.2d 446 (1984).
-
Disbursements out of the trust account for earned legal fees should be made payable to the lawyer and not to a third party creditor of the lawyer. Otherwise, a lawyer creates the appearance of using the trust account for the lawyer's own personal or business expenses. This could potentially subject the trust account to attachment by the lawyer's creditors, thereby endangering existing client funds and the status of the account as a trust account.
D. Reconciling Account Records with Monthly Bank Statements
1. Before a trust account can be reconciled with the monthly bank statement, the balances of:
must equal one another.
a. Add together the monthly ending balances of all client subsidiary ledgers.
b. Take the figure you arrived at the previous month when you reconciled your cash receipts and cash disbursements journals. Add the cash receipts journal balance for the month in question, subtract the cash disbursements journal balance for that month.
c. Take the balance in the checkbook register at the end of the month in question.
d. The figures for a, b, and c must be equal. If they are not, look for entries that don't match or addition or subtraction errors, until all three figures are the same.
2. Interest and Bank Costs
a. For IOLTA accounts, interest credits are paid by the financial institution directly to the Lawyers Trust Fund, and certain legitimate and reasonable bank costs are paid by the Fund directly to the bank. If your monthly bank statement reflects interest credited but not yet paid out to the Lawyers Trust fund or bank charges not yet paid by the Fund, you should adjust the balance shown on the monthly bank statement accordingly. The interest and the charges should not be entered on your ledgers, cash journals, or checkbook register.
b. If you have an account where interest is credited to individual clients whose funds are held in the account, after bank costs are deducted, you will not adjust the balance shown on the bank statement, but you must add the net interest to your client subsidiary ledgers, your cash receipts journal, and your checkbook register.
3. Monthly Trust Account Reconciliation.
The bank statement balance is reconciled with the other balances as follows:
a. Take the balance shown on the monthly bank statement. (For IOLTA accounts, that balance may have to be adjusted as discussed in (2)(a) above.)
b. Add any deposits not credited on the bank statements.
c. Subtract checks not debited on the bank statement.
d. The balance should be equal to the three balances described in (1)(a), (b) and (c) above -- the client subsidiary ledgers balance, the cash disbursements and receipts journals balance, and the checkbook register balance.
E. Sample Trust Account Transactions, Trust Account Trial Balances and Trust Account Reconciliation
1. Sample Trust Account Transactions
Julia Dolan is a sole practitioner. On September 30, 1994, the bank statement balance for Dolan's IOLTA trust account is $10,241.66. These funds are identified as follows:
a. $10,000 represents escrow money which was deposited into Dolan's trust account on September 1, 1994, on behalf of her client Ron Roper.
b. $200 represents funds of Julia Dolan which were deposited into the trust account in order to maintain a minimum balance necessary to avoid bank service charges.
c. $41.66 represents the interest credited for the month of September which has yet to be paid by the bank to
IOLTA.
The only subsidiary ledgers with outstanding balances on September 30, 1994, are those for Roper and Dolan. Because this is an IOLTA account, the interest figure ($41.66) does not appear on the subsidiary ledger.
|
CLIENT
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
Name of
Client: Ron Roper
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: Real Estate Escrow - Hadley
File or Case Number: 94-161 |
| DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS
PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
| 09/01/94 |
Deposit -
Escrow |
|
|
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
CLIENT
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
Name of Client: Julia
Dolan, Attorney at Law
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: None
File or Case Number: None |
| DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS
PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
| 01/01/94 |
Minimum
balance amount to avoid service charge |
|
|
$200 |
$200 |
On October 1, 1994, Joan Smith, a client, gives Dolan a $1000 retainer. The fee agreement with Smith provides that the retainer is to be placed in the trust account and withdrawn as earned.
|
CLIENT
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
Name of
Client: Joan Smith
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: Marital Dissolution
File or Case Number: 94-1057 |
|
DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
|
01/01/94 |
Retainer - Smith |
|
|
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
|
CASH
RECEIPTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
OCTOBER 1994 |
|
DATE |
SOURCE |
CLIENT |
DEPOSIT |
AMOUNT |
|
10/01/94 |
Smith check #2398 |
Joan Smith |
50062 |
$1,000 |
On October 5, 1994, client James Johnson is ordered to endorse his federal and state tax refunds of $2,000 and deposit them into Dolan's trust account. The refunds will be distributed upon further order of the court.
|
CASH
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
Name of
Client: James Johnson
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: Dissolution
File or Case Number: 93-1058 |
|
DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
|
10/05/94 |
Fed/State Refund |
|
|
$2,000 |
$2,000 |
|
CASH
RECEIPTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
OCTOBER 1994 |
|
DATE |
SOURCE |
CLIENT |
DEPOSIT |
AMOUNT |
|
10/01/94 |
Smith check #2398 |
Joan Smith |
50062 |
$1,000 |
|
10/05/94 |
Fed & State Refund |
James Johnson |
50145 |
$2,000 |
On October 13, 1994, Dolan receives a settlement check in the amount of $15,000 from Ace Insurance Company for her client Bill Grey. Dolan prepares a written settlement statement, in accordance with the terms of the written contingent fee agreement and Rule 1.5(c):
|
Personal
Injury
Settlement Statement
Bill Grey vs.
Ace Insurance Co. |
|
Settlement
Amount from Ace Insurance Co. |
|
$15,000.00 |
| |
|
|
| Court Reporter
Inc. |
$400.00 |
|
| Process Server
Inc. |
$ 60.00 |
|
| Dr. Bailey,
Expert |
$340.00 |
|
|
Total
Expenses |
|
$ 800.00 |
| |
|
|
| Attorney Fees
(1/3 gross rec.) |
|
$ 5,000.00 |
| Amount Due
Bill Grey |
|
$ 9,200.00 |
On October 20, 1994, Dolan makes the disbursements in accordance with the settlement statement after allowing seven days for the insurance company check to clear.
|
CLIENT
SUBSIDIARY LEDGER PAGE
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
Name of
Client: Bill Grey
Legal Matter/Adverse Party: Personal Injury-Ace Ins. Co.
File or Case Number: 91-1002 |
|
DATE |
DESCRIPTION
OF TRANSACTION |
CHECK |
FUNDS PAID |
FUNDS
RECEIVED |
BALANCE |
|
10/13/94 |
Ace Insurance Co. |
|
|
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
|
10/20/94 |
Court Reporter Inc. |
1005 |
$400 |
|
$14,600 |
|
10/20/94 |
Process Server Inc. |
1006 |
$60 |
|
$14,540 |
|
10/20/94 |
Dr. Bailey |
1007 |
$340 |
|
$14,200 |
|
10/20/94 |
Bill Grey |
1008 |
$9,200 |
|
$5,000 |
|
10/20/94 |
Julia Dolan-Fees |
1009 |
$5,000 |
|
$0 |
|
CASH
RECEIPTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
OCTOBER 1994 |
|
DATE |
SOURCE |
CLIENT |
DEPOSIT |
AMOUNT |
|
10/01/94 |
Smith check #2398 |
Joan Smith |
50062 |
$1,000 |
|
10/05/94 |
Fed & State Refund |
James Johnson |
50145 |
$2,000 |
|
10/13/94 |
Ace Insurance Co. |
Bill Grey |
62001 |
$15,000 |
|
CASH
DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 123-456
OCTOBER 1994 |
|
DATE |
CHECK |
PAYEE |
PURPOSE |
CLIENT |
AMOUNT |
|
10/20/94 |
1005 |
| |