1990 Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct

Preamble

The practice of law is a public trust.  Lawyers are the trustees of the system by which citizens resolve disputes among themselves, punish and deter crime, and determine their relative rights and responsibilities toward each other and their government.  Lawyers therefore are responsible for the character, competence and integrity of the persons whom they assist in joining their profession; for assuring access to that system through the availability of competent legal counsel; for maintaining public confidence in the system of justice by acting competently and with loyalty to the best interests of their clients; by working to improve that system to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing society; and by defending the integrity of the judicial system against those who would corrupt, abuse or defraud it.

To achieve these ends the practice of law is regulated by the following rules.  Violation of these rules is grounds for discipline.  No set of prohibitions, however, can adequately articulate the positive values or goals sought to be advanced by those prohibitions.  This preamble therefore seeks to articulate those values in much the same way as did the former canons set forth in the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility.  Lawyers seeking to conform their conduct to the requirements of these rules should look to the values described in this preamble for guidance in interpreting the difficult issues which may arise under the rules.

The policies which underlie the various rules may, under certain circumstances, be in some tension with each other.  Wherever feasible, the rules themselves seek to resolve such conflicts with clear statements of duty.  For example, a lawyer must disclose, even in breach of a client confidence, a client's intent to commit a crime involving a serious risk of bodily harm.  In other cases, lawyers must carefully weigh conflicting values, and make decisions, at the peril of violating one or more of the following rules.  Lawyers are trained to make just such decisions, however, and should not shrink from the task.  To reach correct ethical decisions, lawyers must be sensitive to the duties imposed by these rules and, whenever practical, should discuss particularly difficult issues with their peers.

Timely, affordable counsel is essential if disputes are to be avoided and, when necessary, resolved.  Basic rights have little meaning without access to the judicial system which vindicates them.  Effective access to that system often requires the assistance of counsel.

It is the responsibility of those licensed as officers of the court to use their training, experience and skills to provide services in the public interest for which compensation may not be available.  It is the responsibility of those who manage law firms to create an environment that is hospitable to the rendering of a reasonable amount of uncompensated service by lawyers practicing in that firm.

Service in the public interest may take many forms.  These include but are not limited to pro bono representation of persons unable to pay for legal services and assistance in the organized bar's efforts at law reform.  An individual lawyer's efforts in these areas is evidence of the lawyer's good character and fitness to practice law, and the efforts of the bar as a whole are essential to the bar's maintenance of professionalism.

The absence from the proposed new rules of ABA Model Rule 6.1 regarding pro bono and public service therefore should not be interpreted as limiting the responsibility of attorneys to render uncompensated service in the public interest.  Rather, the rationale for the absence of ABA Model Rule 6.1 is that this concept is not appropriate for a disciplinary code, because an appropriate disciplinary standard regarding pro bono and public service is difficult, if not impossible, to articulate.  That ABA Model Rule 6.1 itself uses the word "should" instead of "shall" in describing this duty reflects the uncertainty of the ABA on this issue.

The quality of the legal professional can be no better than that of its members.  Lawyers must exercise good judgment and candor in supporting applicants for membership in the bar.

Lawyers also must assist in the policing of lawyer misconduct.  The vigilance of the bar in preventing and, where required, reporting misconduct can be a formidable deterrent to such misconduct, and a key to maintaining public confidence in the integrity of the profession as a whole in the face of the egregious misconduct of a few.

Legal services are not a commodity.  Rather, they are the result of the efforts, training, judgment and experience of the members of a learned profession.  These rules reflect the sensitive task of striking a balance between making available useful information regarding the availability and merits of lawyers and the need to protect the public against deceptive or overreaching practices.  All communications with clients and potential clients should be consistent with these values.

The lawyer-client relationship is one of trust and confidence.  Such confidence only can be maintained if the lawyer acts competently and zealously pursues the client's interests within the bounds of the law.  "Zealously" does not mean mindlessly or unfairly or oppressively.  Rather, it is the duty of all lawyers to seek resolution of disputes at the least cost in time, expense and trauma to all parties and to the courts.